Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review
Statement of problem: Intraoral scan body (ISB) design is highly variable and its role in the digital workflow and accuracy of digital scans is not well understood.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the relevant reports pertaining to ISBs with regard to design and accuracy and to describe their evolution and role in the digital dentistry workflow. Special attention was placed on their key features in relation to intraoral scanning technology and the digitization process.
Materials and methods: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was performed to identify relevant reports pertaining to ISB usage in dentistry. This search included but was not limited to scan body features and design, scan body accuracy, and scan body techniques and the role of ISBs in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) processes. Commercially available scan bodies were examined, and a patient situation was shown highlighting the use of ISBs in the digital workflow.
Results: Deficiencies in the reports were found regarding various scan body topics, including ISB features/design, accuracy, and the role of ISBs in CAD-CAM processes.
Conclusions: ISBs are complex implant-positioning-transfer devices that play an essential role in the digital workflow and fabrication of accurately fitting implant-supported restorations. With scanner technology rapidly evolving and becoming more widespread, future studies are needed and should be directed toward all parts of the digital workflow when using ISBs. By understanding the basic components of ISBs and how they relate to digital scanning and CAD-CAM technology, more emphasis may be placed on their importance and usage in the digital workflow to ensure accurate transfer of implant position to the virtual and analog definitive cast. Efforts should be made by clinicians to identify an optimal ISB design in relation to the specific intraoral scanning technology being used.
Copyright © 2017 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M.BMC Oral Health. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0.PMID: 28927393 Free PMC article. Review.
- Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review.Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, Lemos BF, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV, Herrero-Climent M.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 24;18(3):1020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031020.PMID: 33498902 Free PMC article. Review.
- A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study.Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, Greven M, Wismeijer D.J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Oct 27.PMID: 27881321
- Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, Seidt J, Johnston WM.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Apr 27.PMID: 31040026
- Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report.Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;75(12):2541-2549. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 12.PMID: 28881181
- Effect of Scanned Area and Operator on the Accuracy of Dentate Arch Scans with a Single Implant.Marques VR, Çakmak G, Yilmaz H, Abou-Ayash S, Donmez MB, Yilmaz B.J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 15;11(14):4125. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144125.PMID: 35887889 Free PMC article.
- In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.Costa V, Silva AS, Costa R, Barreiros P, Mendes J, Mendes JM.Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jun 15;10(6):112. doi: 10.3390/dj10060112.PMID: 35735654 Free PMC article.
- PEEK Biomaterial in Long-Term Provisional Implant Restorations: A Review.Suphangul S, Rokaya D, Kanchanasobhana C, Rungsiyakull P, Chaijareenont P.J Funct Biomater. 2022 Mar 22;13(2):33. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020033.PMID: 35466215 Free PMC article.
- In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems.Orejas-Perez J, Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Ortiz-Collado I, Thuissard IJ, Santamaria-Laorden A.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074300.PMID: 35409985 Free PMC article.
- An Integrated Fully Digital Prosthetic Workflow for the Immediate Full-Arch Restoration of Edentulous Patients-A Case Report.Sobczak B, Majewski P.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):4126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074126.PMID: 35409808 Free PMC article.